Search for: "DOES 1-100, exclusive"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
The questions asked of the USPTO, and specifically Director Kappos, related to the USPTO interpretation of the grace period in 102(b)(1)(B). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:09 am
However, the fact that plaintiff was not traveling in excess of 100 miles per hour does not prevent the Court from concluding that plaintiff's loss fell within the terms of the subject policy exclusion. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:34 am
” The second limitation, [f], requires that “the content of Co in the transition metal M1 of the formulae (1) and (2) is from 30% by mole to 100% by mole. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
(The present comp law will be 100 years old on 7/1/14.) [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:05 am
The Bill lists four particular eligibility exclusions that would be codified within a new Section 101(b)(1). [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 1:26 pm
Here are a few suggestions: Step 1: Consider if the ETS Applies Keep in mind that the ETS only applies to private employers with 100 or more employees. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:00 am
Nor can any such exclusion be implicitly derived therefrom. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
Why does this matter? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:43 pm
The encroacher claims an exclusive prescriptive easement; after all, it's fenced, he has had 100% use for more then five years. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:00 am
According to Ashley Keller, Managing Director of Gerchen Keller Capital, speaking at the IP Dealmakers Forum in New York City, his company is funding 1 out of ever 100 cases they are asked to review these days. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 6:31 am
Covered Employees: The ETS covers approximately all employees except those employees who work remotely from their homes, exclusively by themselves, or exclusively outdoors. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
It should be as easy as 1 + 1 = 2. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Without evidence that doctors refuse to do so, there's no real evidence that Orphan exclusivity does much harm. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:39 pm
Each was interesting in its way.Subjective question: 100 people were asked, which is the most unfair tax system? [read post]
21 May 2013, 6:46 am
Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
For example, the Act does not seem to consider an entity that is the 100% owner of a subsidiary as the “Beneficial Owner” of such subsidiary; instead the subsidiary would be required to report individuals (whether at the 100% owner level or even higher up the ownership chain) that actually meet the ownership or control tests. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:23 pm
Revision of Rates and Rating Values – Effective January 1, 2014The Commissioner of Banking and Insurance (“Commissioner”) has approved a 3.6%increase in rates and rating values applicable to New Jersey workers compensation and employersliability insurance effective January 1, 2014 on a new and renewal basis. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 12:24 pm
” In other words, in order to be patentable, that snowflake really does have to be pretty special. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
That particular allegation is that Vitamin Energy’s “representation that its products contain ... 100% Daily Value of Vitamin B is intended to leave, and does leave, the false and/or misleading impression that, among other things, all ofVitamin Energy’s Products have... more Vitamin B Vitamins than 5-hour Energy’s Products. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:56 am
In particular, the Commission noted that ETSI's IPR policy does not prohibit patent owners from seeking injunctive relief, and that several attempts to add such language have failed. [...] [read post]
