Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 41 - 60 of 32,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 3:58 pm by KJK
Typically, attorneys filing John Doe lawsuits guide their clients through the following steps: 1.) [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:32 am by Dan Cooper and Laura Somaini
  This does not apply to business and for-profit activities. [read post]
30 May 2024, 6:42 am
These were described by the SRSG in the 2008 SRSG Report 8/5: The general nature of the duty to protect is well understood by human rights experts within governments and beyond. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:55 pm by David Pocklington
The faculty application was for Part 1 of this consented scheme [4]. [read post]
27 May 2024, 11:07 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Update: @SacPolice says 5 shot: 3 males, 2 female and 4 adults, 1 juvenile female. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:03 pm by News Desk
Some of the significant violations Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls: 1. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
    INCIDENT RESPONSE PROGRAM Under the Final Amendments, S-P entities must establish an incident response program that is “reasonably designed to detect, respond to, and recover from both unauthorized access to and unauthorized use of customer information”[8] and that includes notification procedures designed to inform potentially affected individuals. [read post]
26 May 2024, 6:47 am by Lawrence Solum
 Clearly, the phrase "freedom of speech" did not and still does not communicate propositions related to billboards. [read post]
25 May 2024, 5:36 am by Amichai Cohen
Accordingly, by way of an example, the Pre-Trial Chamber’s prior decision to treat Palestine as a State for accession purposes does not address whether the use of force by Israel in Palestinian territory without the Palestinian Authority’s consent triggers an IAC, especially if Israel has a reasonable basis to conclude Palestine is not a State for those or other purposes. [read post]
24 May 2024, 10:21 am by Jessica Statler
  However, estate planners and wealthy clients faced a similar situation in 2012 when the applicable exclusion amount was supposed to roll back from $3.5 million to $1 million on January 1, 2013. [read post]