Search for: "DOES 1-82"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Someone who is “presumed innocent in law” does not necessarily mean they did not commit the crime. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
"1. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
Differentiated competition exists in service markets, just as it does in product markets. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
In finding that Wise had complied with his obligations two matters were clarified by the Court of Appeal as matter which were in the public interest: 1) Is the Commissioner obliged to reach a definitive decision on the merits of each and every complaint or does he have a discretion to decide that some other outcome is appropriate? [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:41 am
Research does not believe it will render anything useful or greatly improve the company’s revenues. [read post]
The GDPR as a cyber risk management system: the ECJ cautiously tackles data breaches in the NAP case
22 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm
A broad interpretation of the concept of damage is supported by the wording of Art 82(1), which does not distinguish between actual and potential damage, and of recitals 146 and 85, which specifically refers to the loss of control of one’s data (paras 79-82). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
During his tenure, the Commission adopted a very significant and impactful regulation — rule 146 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).[1] If rule 146 does not ring a bell, do not worry. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
From a methodological perspective, the CJEU’s latest ruling does not fit squarely within the uniform reading of the GDPR that the Court had previously adopted with respect to the interpretation of Article 82 GDPR. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Section 241 does not fit that description. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
SEC, No. 22-1142, 82 F.4th 1239 (D.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Solum, Originalism and Constitutional Construction, 82 Fordham L. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:53 am
Latest Revisions The following proposed revisions are the result of comments subsequent to the second 15-day notice and Cal/OSHA Standards Board staff consideration: Subsection (a)(1) exception (C) (scope): Does not apply to designated incidental exposures for specified time duration.Subsection (a)(1) exception (D)(scope): Emergency operation addressing protection of life or property.Subsection (a)(5) (scope): Deleted.Subsection (b)(11): Definition of “high… [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
Possession of explosives without lawful excuse is covered under s. 82(1) of the Criminal Code found in Part II. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 11:38 am
Weapons are defined under s. 2 of the Criminal Code (1988): a weapon is anything that is used or intended to be used to cause injury, death, for the purpose of threatening or intimidating another as well as any firearms defined under s. 82 of the Criminal Code (1988). [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
That does not matter now, however. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 2:00 pm
Aufschlussreich ist auch ein Artikel der FAZ von 2016: «Wikimedia-Deutschland hat 82 hauptamtliche Mitarbeiter. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:48 am
Most notably, the referring Board of Appeal in T 0116/18 concluded that G2/21 does not necessitate a positive statement or experimental evidence of a technical effect in order for the said effect to be relied on for inventive step. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:57 pm
But the authors noted that this does not mean that these are “bad actors”; just that the company is trying to solve a really difficult problem for very few people. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
(§81-82). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
But I digress.)Over the course of an 82-game regular season, teams distinguish themselves from one another in various ways, and accordingly, the point-difference tie-breaker almost never comes into play. [read post]
