Search for: "DOMINIC v. ANDERSON"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
But it wasn't just technology vs content: two major platforms, Spotify and Deezer, urged European legislators to ensure that the globally dominant giant US technology companies (primarily Apple, Amazon and Google) don't abuse their position as gatekeepers to digital consumers, not least as all three tech giants make and operate devices, control transaction platforms and own content services. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
Several years later, in Anderson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
Some lobbyists applauded the move for forcing a male-dominated industry to think about its hiring practices. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm
It was Elkins’ judgment that catapulted V&E into the upper echelon: “‘There wasn’t a man alive who could dominate anything Judge Elkins was in, except Judge Elkins’” (Texas Monthly, Nov. 1973). [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
Adrian Vermeule argued that the use of Morrison v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am
The Hill reports that the EU will consider several different plans to require backdoors in encryption products this June, according to EU Commissioner for Human Rights Věra Jourová. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Anderson, M. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:42 am
Bolger v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:17 am
Take, for example, King v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
Dominic Jackson, 2015-1137 (argued May 31, 2016) State of Ohio v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
Also taking second place for the second year in a row is Anderson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
She turned them over to Chan, who then consulted with Rothschild about whether to open them.One envelope was addressed to SPM and a woman named Brianna Stiles, while the other was addressed to SPM and a woman named Savannah Anderson. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
Backed by U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:35 am
The US Ninth Circuit ruling in Lenz v Universal Music Corp. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Meanwhile, Mark Anderson, the doyen of IP transactional bloggers, expresses in IP Draughts his own perplexity at the increasingly execrated ruling of the US Supreme Court on post-expiry royalty payments in Kimble v Marvel. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Court-related coverage and commentary are dominated by Friday’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
Different concerns: size (2 gigs now); iBooks Author dominates the market with self-creating books. [read post]
