Search for: "DOWELL v. DOWELL" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 8:01 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
Playhut, Inc., 85 Cal.App.4th, 927, 934-35 (2000) (refusing to narrowly construe invalid covenant not to compete so as to make it enforceable); Dowell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
When this evidence came to light the accused appealed against his conviction to the criminal appeal court in Edinburgh (see Fraser (Nat Gordon) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am by INFORRM
  The case is also discussed by Katy Dowell in the Lawyer. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Rosalind English
The school argued that the matrilineal test was based on religious law and the discrimination the school had applied based on the test was religious discrimination, not racial discrimination under s.1 RRA; they also contended that although there was a Jewish ethnic group as defined by the criteria set out in Mandla (Sewa Singh) v Dowell Lee (1983) 2 AC 548 HL, the matrilineal test described a group that overlapped with, but was not identical to, the ethnic group. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:40 am
The Court found it simpler to reach that conclusion because of a 1983 House of Lords decision, Mandla v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Ford Motor Credit Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Nov. 19, 2009) (Second Appellate District, Division Three) Dowell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:28 pm
Dowell and Wacher, 2007 BCSC 1985, and  Kanani v. [read post]