Search for: "DOWLING v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 8:30 pm by Ben Sheffner
Hart has a very smart post debunking the superficial and ultimately silly argument that copyright infringement must never be referred to as "theft" because the Supreme Court held in Dowling v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Dowling of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas provides an excellent synopsis and overview of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's products liability decision in Tincher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:38 am by Derek Fincham
In our current digitally connected age it is easier than ever now to document and share the proliferation of art meant to protest, encourage, and criticize the current state of institutional racism in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:12 pm
Coan has this editorial on Hein v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Capilano Honey Ltd v Dowling (No 4) [2021] NSWSC 264, the claim concerned actions for defamation and injurious falsehood alleged across eleven articles. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:51 am by Dennis Crouch
Of course, these suggestions from Sotomayor are not part of the majority opinion, which did not cite Barrett or the Learned Hand decision of Dowling v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOWLING, JJ. 2021-09160 (Index No. 610064/20) In the Matter of Christopher DeNigris, appellant, vSmithtown Central School District, respondent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOWLING, JJ. 2021-09160 (Index No. 610064/20) In the Matter of Christopher DeNigris, appellant, vSmithtown Central School District, respondent. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Jillian A. Centanni
In determining that the source code did not constitute stolen “goods” within the statutory definition, the Second Circuit joined several other circuits in relying on Dowling v. [read post]