Search for: "Daimler AG" Results 41 - 60 of 330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 12:30 am by Florian Mueller
" It's understandable that old companies need some time to adjust to the Digital Age, but neither the market nor patent abusers will give them that much time. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am by Florian Mueller
The Digital Age belongs to America and parts of Asia, and Europe is the continent of losers that is more concerned with its history and diversity, and with taking care of poor neighbors, than its own future. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am by Sophie Corke
At Pizza Limited | Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are Movie Producers | UK patent exams update: Major changes to invigilation arrangements for candidates taking the exams in the office | UK patent exams update: Final version of FAQs released | When free-riding someone else's brand might be a win-win situation | [Guestpost]: IP implications of 3D printing, a new studyNever Too Late 279 [Week ending August 23] No CJEU reference (yet) as Mannheim… [read post]
This month the Mannheim Regional Court released a decision (here) in the dispute between Daimler AG, owner of the famous Mercedes-Benz brand, and the Finnish company Nokia (also see our previous post on this blog (Another CJEU ruling on standard-essential patents and FRAND looks inevitable). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:37 pm by Howard Bashman
“Tesla, automakers urge FTC to seek appeal after defeat in Qualcomm case”: Stephen Nellis of Reuters has a report that begins, “A group of tech companies and automakers, including Tesla Inc, Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor Co Ltd and Daimler AG, on Monday urged the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:09 am by Sophie Corke
Its press release (in German) can be found here.The dispute in Case 2 O 34/19 between Daimler AG (the owner of the Mercedes-Benz marque) and Nokia Oyj relates to Nokia's patent EP2981103, which the court today found to have been infringed by Daimler. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:06 am by Florian Mueller
Daimler trial) I emailed a spokesman for the court just to ascertain that the room at least had eletrical ventilation.Finally, the ministry notes that the plexiglass panes installed on the tables in front of counsel were "customary. [read post]
The Court reaffirmed Daimler (C‑179/1- Daimler AG) in that the notion of infringing ‘use’ does not include the reproduction of signs identical/similar to a registered mark provided by a third-party online publisher ‘on their own initiative and in their own name, on other websites’. [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:57 pm by Marc Benitah
’ (Daimler Financial Services AG v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/05/1, Award (22 August 2012), para. 52.) [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:03 am by Florian Mueller
He should have started with Daimler's user interfaces, but that was probably a world too far from his area of expertise. [read post]
Consider, for example, courts where the employee or new employer are located (including where the new employer is incorporated or maintains its principal place of business, both of which subject the new employer to general personal jurisdiction under Daimler AG v. [read post]