Search for: "Daniels, Appeal of"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 3:22 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act.Jack Daniel's argues that the petition should be granted because (1) the Courts of Appeals are divided on the Questions Presented, (2) the Questions Presented Are recurring, important, and squarely presented, and (3) the decision below is egregiously wrong. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:51 am
Criminal Procedure — Joint defendants — Severance In this consolidated appeal, appellants, Daniel James, Cory Knight, and Antonio McClennon, challenge their convictions for first-degree and second-degree assault, armed carjacking, carjacking, conspiracy to commit armed carjacking, and use of handgun in the commission of a felony. [read post]
27 May 2019, 7:37 pm
Attorney Daniel P. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
VIP Products, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision that a dog toy created by VIP Products parodying the Jack Daniel’s trademark and trade dress was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
VIP Products, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision that a dog toy created by VIP Products parodying the Jack Daniel’s trademark and trade dress was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
VIP Products, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision that a dog toy created by VIP Products parodying the Jack Daniel’s trademark and trade dress was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
VIP Products, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision that a dog toy created by VIP Products parodying the Jack Daniel’s trademark and trade dress was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
VIP Products, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision that a dog toy created by VIP Products parodying the Jack Daniel’s trademark and trade dress was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
VIP Products, the Supreme Court unanimously vacated the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision that a dog toy created by VIP Products parodying the Jack Daniel’s trademark and trade dress was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Another Court of Appeal “Any court had jurisdiction to stay the execution of a warrant of possession issued under section 89 of the Housing Act 1980. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:03 pm
” -Daniel Ellsberg, NPR archived recording. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Coincidentally, the Court of Appeal also issues this opinion today, which contains a long -- and I mean, long -- discussion of the personal interactions between Jason P. and Danielle S. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit “summarily affirmed” the district court’s summary judgment ruling for VIP on remand. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit “summarily affirmed” the district court’s summary judgment ruling for VIP on remand. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:35 pm
For those who don’t know, Jack Daniels is a form of Whiskey. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 12:12 pm
” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:13 am
Updating this ILB entry from June 22nd, the appeal hearing of Daniel Ray Wilkes’ death sentence continues in Evansville and... [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 11:21 am
Daniel, Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-1161. [read post]
