Search for: "David Hricik"
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2008, 12:09 pm
David Hricik and Chase Scott have published a thorough piece on where most common software creates metadata, available here in the February 2008 Georgia Bar Journal. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:43 am
By Dennis Crouch and David Hricik Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:49 pm
By David Hricik This one will make your head spin, especially the statutory construction part. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:57 am
by David Hricik [Originally published on Nov 1] The announcement is here. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:46 am
Patently-O comments on the Therasense amicus brief by our own David Hricik. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 2:25 pm
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School The October 4, 2022 presidential decision awarding sanctions against OpenSky LLC and its counsel is here. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 10:08 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School I’m speaking at a conference in Palo Alto, and one long topic of conversation was about the disagreement between how Judge Albright views Fifth Circuit precedent on mandamus to review discretionary transfers under Section 1404 and the Federal Circuit views that same precedent. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:08 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School An order by Judge Alsup in Oracle Am., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am
by David Hricik Over on the main page, Dennis has done a good job laying out the court’s “analysis” in Versata v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 4:50 pm
In response, Professor David Hricik, a statutory construction scholar and a former patent litigator, has taken issue with this old-style textualism. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) requires that fraud or mistake be pled with particularity. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
" David Hricik has this post today at "Patently-O. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 2:08 pm
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Judge Albright granted Google’s motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) from the Western District of Texas to the Northern District of California in an opinion in Motion Offense LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:38 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School In Haynes Holding Group LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School In Avus Designs Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School I realize most readers aren’t law professors, so you can stop now… I have taught IP courses for years and often the books seek to teach the subject through cases, which is a very difficult way to learn it. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:04 am
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Giving a talk in Austin and thought I’d share a couple of interesting results I’ll be speaking about later today. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Noted below, Akin Gump had sued a former vendor, Xcential, arguing that its lawyers had invented what Xcential had sought to patent. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:58 am
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Ordinarily, under Model Rule 4.2 you cannot communicate with a person represented by counsel in a matter without opposing counsel’s consent — even if opposing counsel is present (the rule is not limited to “ex parte” communications). [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:14 am
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School A partner at a major firm had been suspended initially for six months for intentionally over-billing certain clients for 450 hours of work she and other lawyers had not performed. [read post]
