Search for: "David Marbury"
Results 41 - 60
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)Globalization has produced a wealth of marvelous work that seeks to theorize the emerging relationships between states, non-state actors (especially multinational corporations), and international organizations. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
See also Marbury v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
Going all the way back to Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:06 am
However, in petit Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
David B. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:00 am
David Sehat: I think that's right. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
To answer that question would require that the courts pass only upon the constitutionality of a law passed by Congress — the kind of duty that a federal court has performed since 1803 and Marbury v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:52 am
*-Judge Milt Hirsch issued a forty page ruling criticizing Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:22 am
Said Obama, quoted in David Remnick's New Yorker article. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
At Scotusblog, David Kopel summarizes the decision in “law review” style, the way that next year’s First Year students might describe the case in their class outlines. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
” He rejects the comparison to Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm
” [Joey Fishkin] Not Marbury, no way, no how [David Wagner, Ninomania] “Polarization and legitimacy: why we’re wigging out” [Will Wilkinson, The Economist] Call off the celebrations, it’s just a satire: “Supreme Court Strikes Down All Laws Signed By Barack Obama” [Balkin] Don’t forget that Cato’s star-packed event looking at the meaning of the NFIB v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:25 pm
Although we do not know Chief Justice Roberts’ motives, I suggestion a comparison of NFIB to Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:58 am
Marbury v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
Well before Marbury v. [read post]
