Search for: "David R. Lord"
Results 41 - 60
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 12:06 am
Macdonald, Lord Vivian's tears: the moral hazards of humanitarian intervention Abigail Green, From protection to humanitarian intervention? [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:24 pm
See for example, this from David Smith, observing (quite correctly, I think): The problem with the Government’s approach is that it is almost certainly unlawful. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 9:04 pm
Arne Westad, The EU's Engagement with Asia Lord William Wallace of Saltaire, Europe's Role in Global Governance: Changing the European Debate [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:56 am
Hasley, of Hasley Scarano; First Vice President David Harrell, of Locke Lord; Second Vice President Diana Gomez, of Chamberlain Hrdlicka; Treasurer Chris Popov, of Vinson & Elkins; and Secretary Daniella D. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:07 pm
Lord Justice Scott Baker does not find lack of balance in extradition treaty. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:00 pm
In this collection of his fortnightly columns from The Times, David Pannick passes judgement [...] [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:41 am
Somebody call Lord Justice Leveson! [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to… [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:03 am
Where personal privacy is concerned, there is a duty on the courts now to offer a degree of protection largely unforeseen in the time of Lord Denning, and his guiding principle would no longer hold sway. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:20 am
The appeal was heard on 07/12/22 by Lords Reed, Kitchen, Hamblen and Stephens and Lady Rose. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:02 pm
David Post responds, in his article Why Should We Care What Jefferson Thought about Copyright, to my earlier post on the subject regarding Jefferson’s letter to Isaac McPherson. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:28 pm
This was particularly troubling when, in the words of Lord Justice McGonigal, the counter-terrorism law then in force ‘leaves it open to an interviewer to use a moderate degree of physical maltreatment for the purpose of inducing a person to make a statement’ (R v McCormick (1977) NI 105, 111). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
” [63] (Lord Neuberger and Lord Judge: Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Mance, Kerr and Reed agreed) The decision of the Divisional Court Now the appeal in Beghal brings the issue squarely before the Court. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:00 am
David Pannick QC has always been much more interested in unpersuasive advocates and injudicious judges. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:22 pm
Murcia's company DMG was shut down by authorities in 2008 and accused of being a ponzi scheme and laundering money for drug lords. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
ATL’s managing editor, David Lat, reviews Blindfolds Off (affiliate link), an interesting collection of interviews with judges about how they decide their toughest cases. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
