Search for: "David-B" Results 41 - 60 of 9,196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Doug Cornelius
In Silicon Valley, You Can Be Worth Billions and It’s Not Enoughby David Streitfeld in The New York Times Twenty one years later, Mr. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Medieval Antecedents: Pre-Reformation Canon Law, Sarah B White (University of Nottingham, UK)2. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 8:48 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Listen on mobile platforms:  ⁠⁠⁠⁠Apple Podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠ |  ⁠⁠⁠⁠Spotify⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠ Contact Us:  Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@gebauerm⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, or ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@glambert⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Threads: @glambertpod or @gebauerm66Email:… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am by CFM Admin
April 19, 2024 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we end the first quarter and enter the spring season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be both interesting and impactful. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am by Norman L. Eisen
Keith Davidson—Davidson, Clifford’s lawyer, is “Lawyer B” in the statement of facts. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by David Pocklington
This will have the effect, for a specified period of time (which I propose should be two years), of depriving the parish of the benefit of List B authorisations. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Buttafuoco, has been decided by the Court of Appeals would Gelwan v De Ratafia 2023 NY Slip Op 32953(U) August 25, 2023 Supreme Court, New York CountyDocket Number: Index No. 654525/2016 Judge: David B. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am by David Pocklington
When considering the approach to be adopted by the court to applications for permission5 the question at that stage is not whether a contempt of court has in fact been committed, but whether proceedings should be brought to establish whether it has or not; b. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:01 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Listen on mobile platforms:  ⁠⁠⁠⁠Apple Podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠ |  ⁠⁠⁠⁠Spotify⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠ Contact Us:  Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@gebauerm⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, or ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@glambert⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Threads: @glambertpod or @gebauerm66Email:… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am by Frank Cranmer
As David Allen Green points out, the Belfast Agreement explicitly requires the ECHR to be enforceable in the Northern Ireland courts – see Strand One para 5(b) – while the Human Rights Act 1998 can only be repealed by primary legislation. [read post]