Search for: "Davis v. C" Results 41 - 60 of 1,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Editorial Board
  Without further ado, here are our top ten most-read posts of 2023: CJEU Strips it Down for OnlyFans (C-695/20 Fenix International v HMRC) By Emilia Cole Oceans Apart: The EU and US Cybersecurity Certification Standards for Cloud Services By Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire and Josh Fox The Data Act: a (slippery) third way beyond personal/non-personal data dualism? [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am by Frank Cranmer
On the close connection test, Nicola Davies LJ concluded as follows: “[PXM] had no caring or pastoral responsibility for the pupils, a factor to which considerable weight is given in previous cases. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Surveillance 65 parliamentarians, including David Davis MP, Caroline Lucas MP, Baroness Shami Chakrabati, Joanna Cherry KC MP and Sir Ed Davey MP, have called for an immediate stop to the use of live facial recognition for surveillance purposes, Big Brother Watch reports. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
On the second proceedings The FTT was entitled to determine the sum which it was reasonable for Mr Davies to pay under paragraph 33(c) of the lease, because it was a variable administration charge over which the FTT is given jurisdiction by paragraph 5(1) of Schedule 11, Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479, 482; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]