Search for: "Davis v. Chang et al" Results 41 - 60 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Research Methodology Much of the data and analysis presented in the article by Barrero et al., are taken from the authors’ own study, the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
Basic Industries, Inc. (15-CA-17525, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 89) Baton Rouge, LA Dec. 18, 2006. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:42 pm by Brett Trout
While the Supreme Court takes very few patent cases, if any case has the chops to make it to the bigs, Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am by Sheppard Mullin
Ball State University, et al., that, under the federal Title VII discrimination statute, an employer can be held vicariously liable for an employee’s unlawful harassment only where that particular employee has been empowered with the authority “to take tangible employment actions against the victim. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  Those cases are Freeman, et al., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Conservation, et al., Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Index No. 3668/2019 (the DEC Action) (together with the VP Action, the Actions) related to the 2019 Modification (NYSCEF Doc No. 71, ,i 17). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Holdsworth, A History of English Law 426–427, and n. 6 (1938); Davies, The Early History of the Patent Specification, 50 L. [read post]