Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
A year ago, almost to the day, my (co-authored) Verdict column focused on the lessons to be learned from a high-profile and boisterous protest by Stanford Law School students at a Federalist Society Speaker Event featuring Judge Kyle Duncan, a conservative Trump-appointed judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 2:43 am
SEDLIK v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
In LNSU#1, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Two federal district courts recently upheld decisions by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (FRBKC) and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) to deny master account applications from Custodia Bank (Custodia) and PayServices Bank (PayServices). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
In Mckesson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
IPSO 20964-23 The Irish Football Association v Sunday Life, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 22008-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (East), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 22867-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (West), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 0825-23 Revell v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 21074-23… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
Martin Davie, Reflections of an Anglican Theologian: Would a Provincial solution require Parliamentary approval? [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Jesse Davis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Davis (10th Cir.1995) 55 F.3d 553 ; Combined Management, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's decision by Judge Denise Cote (S.D.N.Y.) in Farrakhan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:48 am
But in Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Newspaper Journalism and regulation IPSO Resolution Statement – 00019-24 Peach v dorset.live, 7 children in sex cases (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00032-24 Hudson v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 20825-23 Revell v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No… [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:00 pm
Davis and People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:59 am
Despite that alleged performance problem, plaintiff may sue for racial discrimination on a selective enforcement theory under Title VII.The case is Davis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
In July 1999, Democratic Governor Gray Davis reached an agreement with leaders of pro-immigrant organizations and his lawyers and gave up appealing the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that had declared it unconstitutional. [read post]
