Search for: "Davis v. Polk" Results 41 - 60 of 272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 11:37 am by Bill
Holy crow, the guy who argued Erie Railroad v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:02 am
Posted by Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Wednesday, September 7, 2016 Editor's Note: The following post is based on a Davis Polk publication. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:11 am by Broc Romanek
See Exhibits A & B of the speech for handy charts (and this blog from Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu and WSJ article). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:54 am by Broc Romanek
This Davis Polk memo highlights that the EGC revenue cap has been raised for $1.07 billion – adjusted for inflation. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:40 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s news from Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu: The SEC announced a whistleblower award of nearly half a million dollars to a former company officer whose report of misconduct resulted in an SEC enforcement action. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:05 am
Reid, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Friday, October 7, 2016 Tags: Banks, Brexit, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, EU, Europe, Financial institutions, Financial regulation,Financial technology, France, Inside information, International governance, UK Disclosure of Beneficial Ownership After the Panama Papers Posted by Joseph A. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s the intro from this blog by Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu: The SEC instituted a cease-and-desist proceeding in a fairly straightforward enforcement action that nonetheless emphasizes the importance of the requirement that GAAP measures must be provided with “equal or greater prominence” when a company discloses non-GAAP measures. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even accepting plaintiff’s allegations as true, the complaint contains only conclusory allegations that any negligence by defendants in not raising an affirmative claim for interest in a fee dispute between plaintiff and two attorneys was the “but for” cause of plaintiff’s alleged damages (AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]; Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
. * The news is in, and it seems that Davis Polk's financial numbers were at record highs. [read post]