Search for: "Davis v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & W." Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services Web site. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services Web site. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Most importantly, we know that many outbreaks and illnesses are not reported to health departments (Mead et al, 1999), thus these numbers are an underestimation of the true burden of illness. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Second, state and local health departments vary in the level of resources available for foodborne disease outbreak investigations; therefore, some outbreaks are investigated more intensively than others. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
December 19, 2008)Dismissing Petition for review of FAA order denying exemption from Pilot Age 60 RuleCAFC* Davis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
Additionally, respected public health organizations worldwide have reviewed the data, and every major group has stated that food irradiation is a potential tool to protect the public health. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
For publication opinions today (4): In Joel Silverman, Commissioner of the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Separately, the State of Oregon Public Health Division (ODPH) also noted a small cluster of E. coli infections that day. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
Programs for Children with Special Health Care Needs Utah Department of Health Community & Family Health Services Children with Special Health Care Needs 44 North Medical Drive P.O. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]