Search for: "Davis v. Strong"
Results 41 - 60
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2023, 8:03 am
At the oral arguments in two currently pending Supreme Court cases—United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm
” After attempting to negotiate a settlement failed, the EEOC filed its lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
Bumper tap lawyers love Davis v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
Federal prisoner Quartavious Davis asserted that his trial lawyer rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance for not pursuing a plea deal for him, causing him to receive a sentence many times longer than his co-defendants who pleaded guilty. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the denial of certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Virginia, Skinner v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
From yesterday's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Nickie Mali Lum Davis pleaded guilty in 2020 to one count of aiding and abetting in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Grutter v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
The second ground, that Australia is an inappropriate forum, turns on application of the ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test of the Australian forum non conveniens doctrine: Chandrasekaran v Navaratnem [2022] NSWSC 346, [5]–[8]; Sapphire Group Pty Ltd v Luxotico HK Ltd [2021] NSWSC 589, [77]–[80]; Studorp Ltd v Robinson [2012] NSWCA 382, [5], [62]. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But wisdom was in short supply in Jefferson Davis’s cabinet. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Here’s the opening of Justice O’Connor’s separate opinion in Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
See Hizer v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:40 pm
I remember her as a witness who came across as trustworthy, knowledgeable, and fairly balanced in the FTC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
I think the arguments for points 1 and 2 are very strong. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
