Search for: "Davis v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Agency Contact: Ana Torres-Davis, Attorney Advisor, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004, telephone (202) 272-2019, e-mail: atorresdavis@ncd.gov. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Discussion of executive privilege, in turn, usually triggers reference to United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
An explicit statement that courts’ regulating their own procedure was a proper judicial function came a few days later, in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Davis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, expressing his “increasing[] concern” that federal law enforcement agencies appropriate the identity of others without their knowledge or consent and further urging the Justice Department to reevaluate its policies on this tactic . [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Here's how United Sates Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun put it in staying an injunction that a lower court had imposed forbidding CBS from running undercover footage of a beef processing plant in CBS, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
A few days later, on September 17, 2009, defendant agreed to accompany Agent Azad and Detective Maysonet to the United States Attorney’s Office in Brooklyn to be interviewed again. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
As established in United States v. [read post]
