Search for: "Day et al v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Consequently, with the exception of its ruling on the fee litigation issue, the district court's decision is AFFIRMED. 07a0491p.06 2007/12/18 Beattie, et al v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 4:33 pm
On May 1, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an interesting, yet controversial, ruling in Allergan Inc. v Sandoz Inc. et Al., examining obviousness in the context of a combination ophthalmic drug treatment. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 4:57 am by Simon Lester
Micula et al appeal (here), in which the Court of Justice set aside the judgment of the General Court of the EU and referred the case back to the lower court to adjudicate on several pleas and arguments. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (whether an entity can “induce itself” under 271(f)(1))(CVSG, awaiting government brief) Inducement: Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
On 10 July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its judgment in the matter of Alan Philipps et al. v. the Federal Republic of Germany and the Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Mar. 28, 2013); Brief of Amicus Curiae California Employment Lawyers Association in Support of Respondents Sam Duran et al. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in City of Ontario, et al., v. [read post]