Search for: "Day v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue" Results 41 - 60 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  Soon after World War I, a committee of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws started work on a model statute. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:27 am by CFM Admin
SEC RIAs should review their internal procedures to ensure compliance with the custody rules. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:27 am by CFM Admin
SEC RIAs should review their internal procedures to ensure compliance with the custody rules. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Jan. 12): Whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:40 am by skelly
The evolution of sophisticated “insurtech” managing general agents requiring fronting insurance company relationships has also driven the demand for more creative, international reinsurance solutions. [read post]
Commissioner of Internal Revenue is another procedural case, this one asking whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review with the Tax Court following a notice of determination from the IRS is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule subject to equitable tolling. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:01 am by Adam Steinman
Commissioner of Internal Revenue presents the following question: Section 6330(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code establishes a 30-day time limit to... [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:13 am by Amy Howe
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the justices will weigh in on whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the Tax Court of a notice from the IRS is a jurisdictional requirement – so that the Tax Court lacks the power to review the petition when it is filed late – or instead can be extended when circumstances warrant. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether the Court of Appeal erred (i) in its approach to international materials and (ii) by failing to apply a ‘strict necessity’ test when determining whether the Respondent’s treatment of the Appellant during the first 55 days of his detention at Feltham Young Offenders’ Institution breached Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
14 May 2021, 10:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue 20-1472Issue: Whether the 30-day time limit to file a petition for review in the Tax Court of a notice of determination from the commissioner of internal revenue in 26 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Lewis handed down a judgment in the case of Gilham v Mirror Group Newspapers & anr. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Onwude v Dyer & Ors. [read post]
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am by CFM Admin
However, CA RIAs can avoid these additional requirements by engaging a PCAOB-registered auditor to prepare and distribute audited financial statements to all beneficial owners of the pooled investment vehicle, and the Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Comm’r, stating that when the Commissioner of Internal Revenue makes a deficiency assessment, the court places the burden on the taxpayer to prove that the assessment was erroneous. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:20 pm by Linda McClain
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1972) for a man providing care for his elderly mother who was denied governmental benefits that would have gone to a daughter providing the same care. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]