Search for: "Day v. Oxford Management Services"
Results 41 - 60
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm
I): Structures and Powers (Oxford University Press: New York). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Well under Texas law, solely managed community property (including wages) of the non-debtor spouse is not property of bankruptcy estate. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
[v] It costs the practicing bar a lot to subscribe to this service because the editors do a deep dive into what lawyers think of a particular federal judge. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
McCabe, Indiana University, Transgender Rights in the Days of Changing Regulatory Interpretations: Where Are We Now and What is Needed? [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
The libel trial in the case of Doyle v Smith will begin on the same day before Warby J. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:38 am
This rarely used provision, previously in s.32(4) DPA 1998, was relied upon by Mr Justice Warby in a case just the day before DPA 2018 was commenced: Sube v News Group Newspapers & anor [2018] EWHC 1234 (QB) at [88] onwards. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 5:02 am
How active can an information society service be whilst still falling within an intermediary shield (safe harbour)? [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:18 pm
The most important exception to the seven-day deadline applies if operators refer the decision of whether to delete to an independent body of industry self-regulation. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
IB DOES NOT PROVIDE ADVISORY SERVICES TO IB CUSTOMERS AND WILL NOT PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR TRADING OR TAX ADVICE REGARDING THE ACCOUNT. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
”5 These conceptions are at base the product of applied ideology.6 States often evidence their ruling ideologies in their core documents—constitutions, germinal judicial opinion, and the like.7 In the social sciences, including the academic study of law,8 the role of ideology9— its deployment in the service of autonomous “fact” deeply camouflaged within the ideological presumptions of the systems in whose service they are deployed10—helps… [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
This wide-ranging, expansive lecture drew on Chris’s recent, widely praised book, Making Money: Coin, Currency, and the Coming of Capitalism (Oxford, 2015). [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
American Pension Services, Inc., and Curtis L. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
The following day, Mrs. [read post]
