Search for: "Deal, et al v. Grant, et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 993
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
Amazon.com, et. al., the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington denied the motion, concluding the plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint (PAC) failed to allege new material facts. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:40 am
Another case titled Levy v Estate of Mahler et. al., Sup. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:38 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Leaves to Appeal Granted Bankruptcy & Insolvency: Debts Not Released by DischargePoonian, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:15 am
The decision was made in a lawsuit filed by four political parties (PSB et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 7:43 pm
The Delaware Chancery Court recently addressed a novel attorney-client privilege issue in an appraisal action, ruling FairXchange LLC could not shield the merger deal knowledge of its dual-role director/investment funds manager from two plaintiff investor funds because both the funds and the director were in a ‘”circle of confidentiality” in Hyde Park Venture Partners Fund III L.P. et. al. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 2:47 am
The second section briefly presents Claude Reyes et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:12 am
" Here's the order (my commentary continues below the document, where I'll also provide an updated timeline chart):DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
But I'm sure that all they want is a settlement, and increasing the cost of Microsoft's defenses appears to be part of their strategy.Here's the joint filing:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Taamneh, a set of companion cases dealing with the liability of platforms for terrorist material hosted on their services. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:57 am
It reserved its rights to fight the FTC's subpoena, it is officially fighting Microsoft's subpoena, and it will likely bring one or more motions to quash in the Northern District of California, where Sony has been subpoenaed already in the so-called gamers' (actually lawyers') lawsuit.While we're on the subject of that private action in California, Microsoft and the class-action lawyers submitted a proposed briefing schedule yesterday:DeMartini et al.… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm
In Davitashvilli, et. al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:23 pm
Its in-house adjudicative proceeding does not prevent the merger from closing.This is the order on the motion to stay and the next deadlines and hearing dates:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
Judge Corley has just granted the latter:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
Microsoft just made its responsive filing, and it's a motion to stay the case:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
