Search for: "Deal v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 29,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am by Melissa Stewart
COSIS now has nine member States and membership is open to all 39 members of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:21 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Venator Africa (Pty) Ltd v Watts and Another [2024] ZASCA 60] https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2024/60.html [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
The court ruled that digital locks do not trump fair dealing, and instead the two must co-exist. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In addition, it analyses how the Brussels IIb Regulation optimises the provisions of the 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction between the member states of the European Union. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 3:34 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Wright, Penn State Law, Reconsidering CapacityClark Hobson, University of Leicester Law School, Assisted Suicide in the United Kingdom: Can a Human Rights Framework Deal with Freedom-Towards-Death? [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech and struck a blow against government censorship-by-proxy yesterday in NRA v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am by David Oxenford
  (Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:06 am by Melanie O'Brien
The ICJ CERD Cases Two cases brought under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), Armenia v Azerbaijan and Azerbaijan v Armenia, are relevant, both of which center on Nagorno-Karabakh. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:00 am by Francion Brooks (Bristows)
This judgment provides yet another example of the continuing wranglings between parties in SEP disputes dealing with the complications that arise in parallel proceedings in multiple jurisdictions. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:33 pm by Evan Brown
The concurrence reads very differently – in its solicitous treatment of AI – than many other early cases dealing with litigants’ use of AI, such as J.G. v. [read post]