Search for: "Deal v. Warner" Results 41 - 60 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2016, 3:42 pm by Carl Neff
’s attempt to acquire Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:27 am
  Following on from the Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (prescription by brand) Fujifilm v AbbVie [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat) (Arrow declaration) and Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 2988 (Pat) (global FRAND terms) decisions, this provides another example of the UK Patents Court providing highly specific and tailored relief appropriate to the facts of the case. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:26 am by Mark Summerfield
Australia’s competition watchdog has failed to convince a Federal Court judge that a strategy employed by pharmaceutical company Pfizer, to enter the market for generic products upon expiry of its patent covering blockbuster cholesterol-lowering drug LIPITOR, constituted an illegal misuse of market power, or ‘exclusive dealing’: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 113.From the year 2000, when it acquired… [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm by Scott M. Pearson
Democratic Senator Mark Warner has introduced a bill, S.1642, that would override the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:48 am by John Jascob
Liberty Broadband Corporation was a major shareholder of Charter Communications, Inc., which sought to acquire another company in the communications industry to match rival Comcast’s bid to acquire Time Warner Cable (TWC). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
Warner Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff’d by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008), attempting to distinguish Buckman Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 3:30 am by Chip Merlin
Merry Christmas and Peace to All. 1 Horatio Alger Jr., "Job Warner's Christmas," Harper's New Monthly Magazine, December 1863.2Simonetti v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Software Patents Back To The Fore in India http://t.co/sJtaooRu4A -> No Copyright in the title of a literary work says court in India http://t.co/Gft0Vbe6Vi -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15 http://t.co/Py8qeCyjrf -> Here's Warner/Chappell's Plan to Save the "Happy Birthday" Copyright http://t.co/xp5qd2qic0 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15: No change in US law, no data transfer deals – German state DPA h…… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
 As Jeremy explains, it deals with the ‘Kit Kat’ chocolate-snack and its protection as trade mark.* A taste of things to come? [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Warner v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:16 am by Jonathan Bailey
The labels’ case against Vimeo was put on hold pending a ruling by the appeals court in the Viacom v. [read post]