Search for: "Deas v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
Without DEA rulemaking, and outside of the PHE, federal prescribing requirements would revert to their pre-pandemic state. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm by Kurt R. Karst
”) The rule would require that the prescriptions be issued consistent with both state and federal law, and the practitioner to maintain an active DEA registration in the state in which the practitioner is located. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm by Edward T. Kang
In 2020, Purdue pleaded guilty to felony violations for conspiracy to defraud the Unites States and to violate the anti-kickback statute (AKS), admitting to paying prescribers kickbacks to induce them to prescribe OxyContin and to misrepresenting to the DEA that Purdue maintained an effective anti-diversion program when, in actuality, Purdue marketed OxyContin to over 100 health care providers who the company knew were diverting opioids, and agreed to pay $5.5 in criminal fines and… [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:57 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  DEA has traditionally been concerned that mandating such requirements for all DEA registrants could run afoul of some state restrictions. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:05 am by James Kachmar
The Ninth Circuit recently tackled this issue in AK Futures LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm by Bennett Cyphers
Its current and former clients in the US government include, at a minimum, the IRS, the DHS and its subsidiaries ICE and CBP, the DEA, and the FBI. [read post]