Search for: "Decisions Child Care Center, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 8:05 am by Moseley Collins
Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic Inc., (1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, fn 7( In light of the facts of this case, we need not consider the validity of the theory advanced by one Court of Appeal, which premises a duty to parents solely on the basis of a contract they enter into for the care of their child and then permits recovery for emotional distress if that care is not properly rendered. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
Exceptional Child Center, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 2015 WL 14194231 (U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The goal is to reunite parent and child, without the child having to testify, and give the parent more parenting support tools to help them along this road as his/her child ages. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
Still, on the merits, the Los Angeles Times’s David Savage reports that the Justices “took sharp exception . . . to the notion that a search warrant or a parent’s consent was required before a child could be questioned at school by a child-care worker or a police officer. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_04778.htm [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply   Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:38 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Exceptional Child Center, Inc. holding that Medicaid providers do not have a cause of action to challenge a state’s Medicaid reimbursement rates. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm by Laura Berndt
The law does not require employers to accommodate employee child care needs in most cases. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by Joshua Matz
”   Doug Kendall echoes this sentiment at the Huffington Post, where he contends that “this claim is wrong, but if it were to succeed, it would be a constitutional earthquake that would throw into question Medicaid and other federal statutes that create federal/state partnerships to solve nationwide problems such as health care, child welfare and discrimination. [read post]