Search for: "Defender Home Security Company" Results 41 - 60 of 3,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2015, 6:27 pm by John Jascob
The defendants provided cash payments, personal vacations, home renovations, and other kickbacks to an employee of Customer-1 for helping perpetuate the scheme. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Canada is home to about half the world’s extractive companies operating in nearly 100 countries. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:47 am by SearcyLaw
Homeowner (or the Homeowner’s Insurance Company) If you slipped and fell at someone else’s home, you may have a claim against the homeowner. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:47 am by SearcyLaw
Homeowner (or the Homeowner’s Insurance Company) If you slipped and fell at someone else’s home, you may have a claim against the homeowner. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:47 am by SearcyLaw
Homeowner (or the Homeowner’s Insurance Company) If you slipped and fell at someone else’s home, you may have a claim against the homeowner. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 3:04 pm
Or were the property owners, servicing companies and maintenance firms responsible for making sure that the vacant home was secure? [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Oct. 28, 2015) ADT provides electronic security services and equipment to nearly one quarter of those American homes that are equipped with alarm systems. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 7:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The complaint alleges that the defendants breached Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:58 am by Anthony Lake
Beazer was also the defendant in a class action lawsuit over lending practices, which it settled in 2009 for $30.5 million. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:37 am
Because American Home itself had filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11, the company itself was not named as a defendant. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 1:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Background At the outset of the pandemic, at stay-at-home orders kicked in and as work from home became the standard arrangement, demand for Peloton’s products increased significantly. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 10:49 am by Zamansky
The defendant reportedly reaped $137,000 in profit from unsuspecting investors before the SEC suspended trading in the company. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:33 am by zamansky
The defendant reportedly reaped $137,000 in profit from unsuspecting investors before the SEC suspended trading in the company. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:00 am by Kay Morgan
The Policy: Plaintiffs, Frymire Home Services, Inc. and Whitfield Capital LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”), purchased a commercial policy for their office building in Dallas, Texas from Defendant Ohio Security Insurance Company (“OSIC”). [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Brazilian Law Claims: In their motions to dismiss, the defendants argued with respect to the Brazilian securities law claims asserted on behalf of investors who purchased their Petrobras securities on the Bovespa that the claims were subject to mandatory arbitration pursuant to the company’s bylaws. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
Therefore, the court dismissed these claims because under well established law an allegation that defendants were motivated by compensation or alleging defendants should have known of fraud based on their positions within a company are insufficient claims to plead scienter. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]