Search for: "Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Department of the Interior"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 1:20 pm
Mar 2: In the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States Federal Highway Administration (sacred sites)Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:36 pm
” KESSLER TOSSES COUNTERPART NFP REGS A federal judge has invalidated regulations from 2003 designed to “streamline consultation on proposed projects that support the National Fire Plan” (Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm
Jul 22: In the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:59 pm
Defenders Of Wildlife v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:28 am
In Defendants of Wildlife v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:31 pm
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
Reg. 10299 (Thursday, February 24, 2011) / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17/ Docket No. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:29 pm
On October 21, 2008, defendants, the Department of the Interior and its Fish and Wildlife Service (collectively “the Service”) published a final rule designating critical habitat for the wintering piping plover in North Carolina pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:03 pm
The United States, representing the interests of the Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service as amicus curiae, argues that § 9 is ambiguous, that the Appeals Court must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
” Bennett, 520 U.S. at 172. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:12 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) of the federal Department of the Interior listed the Canada lynx as a "threatened" species throughout its U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:54 pm
In Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
The United States, representing the interests of the Department of the Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service as amicus curiae, argues that ? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:56 pm
See Babbitt v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
