Search for: "Dellinger v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, as well as the grant in Buck v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
With Monday’s filing of the reply briefs by the government and the intervenors, the briefing in the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:41 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:36 am
Dellinger advised President William J. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:27 am
In Raines v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm
” In Burwell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:43 am
Katyal and Walter Dellinger. [read post]
12 May 2014, 10:04 pm
By Myanna Dellinger The United States Supreme Court recently held that airlines are allowed to revoke the membership of those of their frequent flyers who complain “too much” about the airline’s services (see Northwest v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am
” Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
Moreno, Cleburne v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Professor Dellinger, for his part, says the scope of the injunction isn’t validly before the Supreme Court unless and until some valid litigant (i.e., not the sponsors, but rather a valid representative of the State of California) appeals it. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
Virginia and Turner v. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Perry and respondent Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
