Search for: "Department of Educ. v. Lewis"
Results 41 - 60
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2020, 7:56 am
” Gaffney v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
Farms, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:51 pm
Preclearance would authorize the Department of Justice (DOJ) to block a voting change that a jurisdiction failed to show has neither a discriminatory purpose nor a discriminatory effect. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
Croson Co., both on affirmative action, and more recently Lewis v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case C-413/99, [2002] ECR I-07091 was raised. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:21 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student at Law (last year), Editor at First Reference In Turnbull v Edmonton Pipe Trades Educational Fund o/a Alberta Pipe Trade College (“Turnbull”), an employer discriminated against its employee in violation of the Alberta Human Rights Act when it dismissed her one day after learning of her high-risk pregnancy. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm
Britt v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm
Britt v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm
Britt v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:03 am
United States Department of the Interior, 1:21-cv-11091-IT; and Responsible Offshore Development Alliance v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm
And this week, in oral argument before the Supreme Court in Lewis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:06 am
In 2010, he was the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in Lewis v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
The Proposed Rule is the result of an extended effort by the Department of Interior, through its subagencies BOEM and BSEE to “streamline its evaluation criteria for determining whether oil, gas and sulfur lessees, right-of-use and easement (RUE) grant holders, and pipeline right-of-way grant holders may be required to provide bonds or other security above the prescribed amounts for base bonds to ensure compliance with their Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) obligations,” primarily… [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:45 am
In Washington Alliance of Technical Workers v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:50 am
Sector Colls. and Univs. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:50 am
Sector Colls. and Univs. v. [read post]
