Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 7:09 pm
., Plaintiff alleged that he received an unsolicited call from a third-party agency inquiring as to Plaintiff’s interest in automotive insurance. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
In January 2011, the plaintiff acquired from the two existing members a one-third membership interest in an LLC pursuant to a written agreement with a provision giving any party the option to revoke the agreement by a specified date in September 2011. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 8:46 am
The court also determined, in light of that holding, that the issue of standing need not be addressed because the court determined that the plaintiffs stated a direct claim. [read post]
23 May 2014, 12:24 pm
It should be noted that the plaintiff purchased this property before the marriage. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am
” At the close of plaintiff’s evidence at trial, the court granted a directed verdict. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 pm
Indeed, absent the filing of a notice of pendency, plaintiff would run the risk of losing its potential mortgage lien to a bona fide purchaser. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:18 am
The Ninth Circuit’s test: “[F]irst, there must be some effect on American foreign commerce; second, the effect must be sufficiently great to present a cognizable injury to plaintiffs under the federal statute; and third, the interests of and links to American foreign commerce must be sufficiently strong in relation to those of other nations to justify an assertion of extraterritorial authority. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
Thereafter, Savory Pie purchased another Comtec pressing machine from a third-party competitor of Comtec, InLine Pie. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
In 2018, Brightstar—one of Harvestar’s biggest customers and a seller of refurbished phones—purchased a 51% controlling stock interest in Harvestar. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
But not all third-party uses have equal weight. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 8:18 am
” This claim was centered around an agreement plaintiffs allegedly had with Chicago Hotel Partners (“CHP”), a hotel operator, to purchase an interest the hotel. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:08 pm
Even if the direct victims of Monsanto’s fraud ended up with crops that were fine, plaintiffs still alleged commercial injury because Monsanto’s misrepresentations caused third parties to use dicamba that destroyed plaintiffs’ crop, so plaintiffs had no soybeans to sell. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
to continue to be a member of MRI LLC until he could sell [his] 20% interest to the defendants or a third-party for what he considered a fair price. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Code, § 16700 et seq.) to provide that, contrary to federal law, indirect purchasers as well as direct purchasers could sue under California law (§ 16750, subd. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
Plaintiffs didn’t have to identify specific third parties with whom they had expectancies, given the allegation of an identifiable class—purchasers of corn, a commodity that is sold in a defined market. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:08 am
In Alloway, the plaintiff purchased a defective boat, which was built by the (manufacturer) defendant. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:21 am
This was the case here; plaintiff did not suffer diversion of trade, which is “direct” injury by reason of deceived consumers. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Therefore, Plaintiffs’ trademark infringement claim will require Plaintiffs to establish a likelihood of actual confusion at the time of purchase. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm
A Nassau Family Lawyer said that, this is a motion by the plaintiff (hereafter wife) for an order 1) adjudging the defendant (hereafter husband) in contempt; 2) enforcing the parties' judgment of divorce; 3) granting her a money judgment for accrued arrears; 4) awarding her counsel fees; 5) awarding her costs (damages) incurred as a result of the husband's breach of the parties' stipulation of settlement; and 6) directing the husband to comply with… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
Since the Supreme Court’s two opinions broke no significant new ground concerning the oppression claim vis-à-vis the prior appellate ruling that I posted about previously, in this post I’m going to focus instead on the more interesting clash of the majority and concurring opinions over the plaintiff’s direct claim for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
