Search for: "Directional Project Support, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 1,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 10:22 am
The projects selected for award are: Directed Technologies, Inc. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
The Court found that Preedy's declaration in support of the motion "simply parroted" the managing agent standard set forth in White v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
The annual POPPY JASPER INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL is produced by volunteers, with the support of Poppy Jasper, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
“Reed Smith’s support of the LexisNexis African Ancestry Network & LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation Fellowship program is one example of how collaboration within the legal industry can provide the resources necessary to move the profession in the direction of inclusion, equality and equity. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
In each area where the EIR is deficient, the EIR skipped a legal requirement, or the record did not support the EIR’s conclusions, or both. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 2:43 am
"In other words, there was "no evidence to support their claims that Mrs. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
Hilltop Group, Inc., et al v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
See Atlantech Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm
[#Energy/Renewables, #Energy/OilGas]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:49 pm
The agreement will allow clients direct access to the best-of-breed offerings from both Esquire and DTI. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
By conceding that the problem was the effect that the light beam had on the appearance of the property — and not either the nature of the beam itself or the message it conveyed — the Respondents have made irrelevant the origin of the light beam, the direction of its projection, and the intent of party projecting it. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
In Valli Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 4:03 am
The court found that the lack of a specific geographic limitation was not fatal to the non-compete clause because it was so narrowly drawn to this particular project and the handful of companies in direct competition with PSS. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
County of Colusa (Adams Group Inc., Real Party in Interest) (3d Dist. 2014) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, Case No. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
While funding at the analyzed levels was not unequivocally guaranteed, an independent fiscal feasibility analysis peer reviewed by Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. evidenced more-than-adequate City funding would be available, a conclusion the Court observed that nothing in the record contradicted, and performance standards and alternative mitigation strategies further ensured transit impact mitigation. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:47 pm
Below is additional information about the project: Description The JD Project, Inc. is a non-profit organization licensed in the State of Ohio and located in Dayton. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, Recovery Act), the program will provide direct payments in lieu of tax credits in support of an estimated 5,000 bio-mass, solar, wind, and other types of renewable energy production facilities. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
 By way of example, ALJ Luckern rejected “respondents’ argument that complainant’s research and development investments should be limited to those projects that are directed to the exact technology of the [asserted patent] and finds further that, based on the evidence…respondents’ argument does not create a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether complainant has satisfied… [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
ASCAP[12] and Video Pipeline, Inc. v. [read post]
