Search for: "Directv Customer Services, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 10:47 am
In several documented instances, the company is also accused of deducting money from the account of a former customer after the customer had terminated service. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:47 am
In several documented instances, the company is also accused of deducting money from the account of a former customer after the customer had terminated service. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
DirecTV Group, Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1332 (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:12 pm by Gareth
(Tiffany (NJ), Inc. v. eBay, Inc.,  600 F.3d 112, quoting Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:18 am by The Docket Navigator
" "[Plaintiff] reasons that DirecTV put the system into service because (i) DirecTV owns the telephone number required to access the system, (2) the system is designed to serve DirecTV's customers, (3) the system accesses DirecTV's backend accounting system for customer data and movie titles, and (4) DirecTV owns a website. . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:37 am
Santa Ana, CA - Quest Software, Inc. sued DIRECTV Operations, LLC for copyright infringement and breach of software license agreement. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
  US Trademarks USTrademarkExchange.com: New web service for sale of registered trade marks (IP finance) Think outside the trademark box – staying on top of recent developments in other areas of IP law can help trade mark owners be more strategic in trying cases (Managing Intellectual Property)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Court of Appeal for District of Columbia affirms laches ruling dismissing REDSKINS cancellation: Pro-Football v Harjo (TTABlog) (The… [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:58 am
DirecTV Group Inc., a provider of satellite TV, with 18 million customers, has the highest rating in the category – 71. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Google Chrome EULA – Controversy over non-exclusive license clause permitting Google to use content submitted through the service: (IP Thinktank), (BriefBlog), (Copyfight), (Copyfight), (The Trademark Blog), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (IPKat), US presidential campaigns clash on patent law: (Out-Law), (IAM), (Anything… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
, US CAFC throws out jury patent infringement verdict, raises potentially invalidating prior art: Finisar v DirecTV: (Patent Prospector), (Hal Wegner), (EDTexweblog.com), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Law360), (Patently-O), (Patently-O), Global Global - General Further resolution needed to keep IP issues in WTO negotiations: (Intellectual Property Watch), Mobile phone manufacturers seek to control rising IP costs: (Intellectual Property Watch), Managing trade… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:46 am
The patents relate to computer-based speech recognition technology and allow for "virtual customer service agent" responses to incoming phone calls from a live person. [read post]