Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Large"
Results 41 - 60
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2016, 5:14 am
Last week, the 6th Circuit decided Richardson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:18 pm
In Lickiss v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm
Again, each state differs somewhat, but by and large the states have adopted Rules of Professional Conduct modeled on a set of rules proposed by the American Bar Association. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
Real Estate claims fill a large part of the Legal Malpractice docket in New York. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
Zurich Insurance Copying Blogger’s Posts In Disciplinary Proceeding Is Fair Use–Denison v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
In Aguilera v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The Jameel argument was largely based on the Claimant’s allegedly poor reputation in view of the Dismissal Allegations. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The vote was largely understood as a de facto referendum on the Law Society of Alberta mandating that its lawyers undertake an Indigenous Cultural Competency Education program, titled “The Path”. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 12:11 pm
Falk Pharma GMBH v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:06 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:20 am
” How effective these orders will be in warding off Brady violations will depend, in large part, on the level of specificity included by the presiding judge. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
:I wanted to update you on a recent court decision relating to the rules on lawyer advertising recently adopted by the Appellate Divisions.In Alexander v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:13 am
The court relied largely on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Zauderer v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
As was discussed in earlier posts, while the SEC largely prevailed in the fight over the validity of the Rule, it lost the First Amendment argument when NAM v SEC reached the DC Court of Appeals. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
"The test of whether a decision is arbitrary or capricious is "determined largely by whether a particular action should have been taken or is justified . . . and whether the administrative action is without foundation in fact.'" (See Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
Had this fallen to the magistrates, under say s.5 of the Public Order Act 1986, rather than to the university’s disciplinary “court”, it is hard to see how the sentence meted out would not have been significantly less. [read post]
