Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Scott"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
, 194 Va. 201, 206, 72 S.E.2d 250, 253 (1952); accord Scott v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:51 am
FEC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” Introducing the personnel record: In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the Appellate Division, Third Department rejected Scott's argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:03 am
Which finally gets us to Scott McInnis. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
” In Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, the Appellate Division, Third Department rejected Scott’s argument that he was denied due process because the Section 75 hearing officer allowed evidence concerning his performance evaluations to be introduced during the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
When a courageous California lawyer, Scott Drexel, was appointed as Chief Disciplinary Counsel to the California State Bar, he tried to change the system. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
The Campbell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
” Lopez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
The Rudder case shows that the employer is liable only for off-duty acts involving the performance of official duties.Rudder was involved in an automobile accident with Scott V. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:52 pm
Bittaker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:49 pm
In light of the acknowledged behavior of Judge Stuard in both the present and companion cases, as well as his public reprimand in Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:51 pm
Duty v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
(Tex. 2009)HOW MANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE ENOUGH FOR AN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PANEL? [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 10:56 pm
Donovan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:42 pm
Scott Dodson, of the University of Arkansas writes a swell article on how the Supreme Court screwed up Bowles v. [read post]
