Search for: "Distance v. Department of Human Resources"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
—As used in this section, the term: 68 (a) “Cannabis delivery device” means an object used, 69 intended for use, or designed for use in preparing, storing, 70 ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing marijuana low-THC 71 cannabis or medical cannabis into the human body. 72 (b) “Caregiver” has the same meaning as provided in s. 29, 73 Art. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
The Los Angeles Police Department, for example, recently created a Preservation of Life Medal to acknowledge officers who save lives by showing restraint and finding safe alternatives to the use of deadly force.Among the "guiding principles" PERF hopes agencies will adopt, here are a few highlights:Make protecting the sanctity of human life officers' primary mission and goal in departmental policies.Use of force training should go beyond SCOTUS decisions like Graham… [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
John Taylor v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:17 am
” Indeed, the VP of human resources stated that essential functions, including lifting and pushing heavy objects, are not necessarily performed on any given day. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:11 am
*************The case is Rincones v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
They are composed of substances that can cause immediate and long-term harm to human, health and protection of public health and must take precedence over the industry’s desire to keep such information secret. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
And where the human imagination goes, lawyers are soon to follow. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm
Amicus the Employers Group is “the nation’s oldest and largest human resources management association, representing nearly 5,000 companies. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
And on the constitutional front, the focus in US v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
The materials provide an excellent resource for cross-examination of an arresting officer. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:24 pm
The alternatives are insufficient—camcording and screen capture are technically difficult and time and resource intensive. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
The research design allows us to examine employment relations and human resource (HR) measures, namely, perceptions of justice, organizational commitment, and perceived legal compliance, in the same locations before and after the implementation of a typical, multistep DRS that begins with informal reporting to local managers and culminates with mandatory arbitration. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
Tom Starner suggested in a Human Resource Executive Online article that “it seems the Supreme Court [...] currently has it in for employers. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:33 am
Department of the Navy (No. 09-1163), holding that Exemption 2 of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) shields only those records relating to employee relations and human resources issues. [read post]
