Search for: "Doe II" Results 41 - 60 of 28,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 5:18 am by Stefanie Jackman and Rene T. McNulty
Supreme Court held that filing a proof of claim on a time-barred debt in a bankruptcy proceeding does not violate the FDCPA sections 807 or 808. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to NIMJ Executive Director Michelle McCluer’s initial thoughts on Blazier II. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:12 am by Jack Goldsmith
 But under domestic law, the use of lawful weapons systems—consistent with the applicable laws of war—for precision targeting of specific high-level belligerent leaders when acting in self-defense or during an armed conflict is not unlawful, and hence does not constitute “assassination. [read post]
ACTOS is a medication used in the treatment of Type II Diabetes. [...]Does Actos Cause Bladder Cancer? [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm
This Essay concerns a specific question about this methodology in cases concerning presidential powers: How does Justice Thomas determine the original meaning of Article II of the U.S. [read post]
The post Estate Planning Lessons from the Movies – Part II appeared first on German Law. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Michael O'Brien
The post Estate Planning Lessons from the Movies – Part II appeared first on The O'Brien Law Firm. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:09 pm by Scott D. Laton
   I noted that while the jury is still out with regard to the benefits of glucosamine, one thing that is clear is that glucosamine does not rebuild cartilage. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by Josh Blackman
Rather, as I explained in my first point, “the lawful exercise of an Article II power—whether signing an executive agreement or vetoing a bill—does not give rise to an impeachable offense. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 7:34 am by Andrew Kent
Does the Constitution Allow the President to Use Article II Powers in Bad Faith? [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals cites a few cases holding that the mere failure to properly deal with workplace harassment does not create an IIED claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:37 am by The Borchardt Law Firm, PLLC
The process does not test the product if it is similar to one the FDA has already approved. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
Hopefully later cases that deal with insidious discrimination rather than affirmative action will confirm the position in Anuj Garg that strict scrutiny does indeed have a role to play in Article 15(1) (and also Articles 19 and 21).Relevant extracts from the Mandal II case are below (all emphases mine):Balakrishnan CJ:179. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:54 pm
  The internal inconsistencies in Weeks II, are almost as breathtaking as its denial that it’s changing the law.So, if prescription drugs are different from other products, to what situations does Weeks II consider them to be more closely analogous? [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:13 am by Jack Goldsmith
 But does anyone in Congress other than Senator Kaine care about this slow, marginal, but relentless expansion of the president’s unilateral Article II war powers? [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:33 am by lgraham@bc-cm.com
  The 68 small businesses received Phase II R&D awards after demonstrating technical feasibility for innovations during their Phase I grants and competed for funding for prototype or process development during Phase II. [read post]