Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 41 - 60
of 749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
" In this section, I examine a number of possible governmental interests that might be thought to support these taxes. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
” Yes, the statute really does have a full cite to the opinion in it. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
[9] Retrospective examination of more than three thousand E. coli culturesobtained between 1973 and 1982 found only one isolatewith serotype O157:H7, and that was a casein 1975.[4, 9] In the ten years that followed, there were approximately thirty outbreaks recorded in the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
” She examines a study published by the California Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB) supplementing its earlier assessments as to medical treatments and costs of COVID-19 claims. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:07 am
Susan V. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am
On August 29, 2023, the Appeals Board issued its second en banc decision upholding its earlier decision [Nunes v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 8:56 am
McCullough v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
If the injured worker does not understand a question, it is acceptable and expected to tell defense counsel the injured worker does not understand a question since the law assumes a person understands a question when they answer it while under oath. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Chapter 440 does not cover an accident resulting in injury, which does not arise out of, but does occur in the course and scope of employment. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
[ix] This duty to assist includes gathering pertinent medical information, gathering personnel records, and providing examinations including soliciting medical opinions about the severity and cause of a veteran’s condition. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
CAUTION: These WCAB panel decisions have not been designated a “significant panel decision” by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:09 am
More specifically, does a doctor fall below the required standard of reasonable care by failing to make a patient aware of an alternative treatment in a situation where the doctor’s opinion was that the alternative treatment was not reasonable, and that opinion was supported by a responsible body of medical opinion (thus complying with what is sometimes referred to as the ‘professional practice test’ set out in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee… [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm
Several medical reports and the deposition testimony of panel qualified medical examiner (PQME), Dr. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:30 am
Susan V. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
On June 22, 2023, the Appeals Board issued an en banc decision in Nunes v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:54 am
The Board acknowledged the principle that a registration cannot be construed to encompass illegal goods (see, for example, Satinine Societa v. [read post]
