Search for: "Doe v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 41 - 60
of 874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 4:24 am
The fact that HMRC mistakenly represented to BDO that Heybridge Lane was the correct address does not prevent HMRC from raising an estoppel by convention. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 1:46 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 2210 The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed this appeal concerning the correct approach as to determining the value of non-negotiable chips for the purpose of calculating gaming duty. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
Commissioner, 152 T.C. at 9 and no. 6 (quoting Molasky v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 1:06 am
On 26 and 27 January 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in the matter of Balhousie Holdings Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:16 am
HMRC, on the other hand argued that ITTOIA does not affect whether someone is an employee, but only regulates the manner in which an employee is taxed. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 10:16 pm
See UPS v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm
In Ofcom v Information Commissioner, the Information Tribunal held that radio frequency waves from a BTS antenna qualifies as emission under EIR, which as a consequence, does not qualify for protection from disclosure, even if the information is deemed confidential. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am
If they are then the expenditure on the disputed items does not qualify for capital allowances. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:49 am
In this post, Tim Sales, a partner in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, and Hannah Jones, who works in the Tax team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Haworth) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 25. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
However, this argument does pose other serious difficulties. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:49 pm
Moreover, [Francis v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:25 am
"Noting that the Assistant Deputy Commissioner who presided over the hearing in this matter considered "the otherwise fine service records" of the officers involved in determining the appropriate penalty for their misconduct, the Appellate Division said that the penalty imposed “does not shock our conscience. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:09 am
See Hicks v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 12, which was handed down on 22 March 2023. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:41 am
United States Board of Water Commissioners. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Evenwel v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Does section 32(1)(c) apply to mistakes of law? [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
This does not stop the entitlement to the information, if entitlement there be, but, if you are coming at the whole issue from a political point of view, it is perhaps a corrective to the 19th century mindset raised at the top of this blog. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:28 pm
In Matter of Perlbinder Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
