Search for: "Doe v. Duncan" Results 41 - 60 of 478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
When the New York City Department of Education [DOE] terminated an individual [Educator] serving in a civil service position in the Unclassified Service* during his probationary period, Educator file a petition pursuant to CPLR Article 78 seeking a court order annulling his dismissal from his position and directing DOE to reinstate him to his former position.Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's petition and the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
When the New York City Department of Education [DOE] terminated an individual [Educator] serving in a civil service position in the Unclassified Service* during his probationary period, Educator file a petition pursuant to CPLR Article 78 seeking a court order annulling his dismissal from his position and directing DOE to reinstate him to his former position.Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's petition and the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:03 am by Madelaine Lane
On November 30, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court reinstated, Duncan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
For this last week: Doe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
  Steve Vladeck previewed the habeas case Duncan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am by Brian A. Comer
This is another punitive damages case, coming shortly after Duncan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:28 am by SHG
  Coming out of secret meetings with students, Duncan oozed his purpose: “A couple of things hit me,” Duncan said. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Federal criminal trial lawyer, Russell Mace, also argued that stalking should not be a crime of violence under United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G) 2K2.1 and 4B1.2 because it does not meet the test set out in the recent Supreme Court decision of Begay v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:28 am by Duncan Hollis
by Duncan Hollis A couple of years ago, Josh Newcomer and I argued that political commitments have developed to a point where they should receive constitutional scrutiny. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
  Philip Devenish & Odysseas G Repousis, CEAC v Montenegro: When does an investor have a ‘seat’ in its home state? [read post]