Search for: "Doe v. Massachusetts Trial Court" Results 41 - 60 of 1,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Autumn Callan
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Thursday that where there is a public-trial violation during jury selection the defendant must demonstrate prejudice to secure a new trial if the issue is raised as an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:49 am by Breakstone, White & Gluck
Two days prior to this, however, on July 26, 2010, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided the case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:20 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
Justice Gaziano, of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”), makes a proclamation in the first paragraph of that Court’s recent decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:24 am
"From the Massachusetts Trial Court Libraries is a site with Massachusetts Law About Neighbors and Trees. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:40 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
A Massachusetts appellate court ordered a new trial after the trial court had granted a doctor's motion for directed verdict in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:58 pm by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently rejected the Commonwealth’s appeal from the suppression of drug evidence by the trial court, holding that the judge properly suppressed the drugs seized from the defendant because the Boston Police conducted an unlawful search and seizure of his person. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 8:16 am by John S. Moffa
Back in 2007, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the highest court in the state, decided Sheehan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 3:19 pm
Plowman, a case decided by the Massachusetts Appeals Court, the court held that sitting in a park car with the engine running does not compel a finding of operation. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:21 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently ruled that it is reversible error and improper for a prosecutor to suggest the defendant had the opportunity to tailor his testimony and lie because he had heard the other witnesses during trial. [read post]