Search for: "Doe v. Providence Health Plans"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Circuit’s long-awaited decision is State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Drivers who pay for health insurance out of pocket earn nearly half of that. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
In Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The Executive Order does not purport to restrict all transactions within its ambit, nor does it establish a mandatory data localization regime. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Further, your firm does not keep records of label review. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 8:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
From Wednesday's opinion in H.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
The Guidelines provide that a detailed statistical analysis plan may be specified after data collection begins, but before any analysis commences. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
“It does not matter if there is one state or 50 states in the plan—the methodology and the result for any particular state would remain the same” (at 35). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:56 pm
However, the commentary in the Proposed Rule states that this threshold question is effectively tied to the sector descriptions in the critical infrastructure Sector-Specific Plans (“SSPs”) that were developed pursuant to PPD-21. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
On that basis it concluded that planning permission would not be granted (24 March 2021). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm
See, e.g., Sargent v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
In all the relevant cases, plan administrators assessed the medical evidence provided, with job attendance being just one factor among many they considered. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:05 pm
I last attended oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the Trump v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
For the past several years, I have assigned the 2013 decision in LSUC v Melnick as required reading to the upper-year students in my Legal Ethics class at Osgoode. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
It allowed the drug to be used through the 10th week of pregnancy, required only one in-person visit to a health-care provider, and permitted health-care providers who are not physicians to prescribe the drug. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
This is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice and is not intended to form an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
