Search for: "Doe v. Selective Service System"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 2:15 pm
Octocom Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:37 pm
When the court unanimously decided Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
Dretke, and Snyder v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 10:53 am
Like the recent Hydentra v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's assertion, simply filing an application for benefits, selecting a retirement date and abstaining from performing services for the employer on the effective date thereof does not constitute a legitimate retirement — particularly where, as here, the applicant in question remains on the employer's payroll and subsequently continues to perform services for the employer. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's assertion, simply filing an application for benefits, selecting a retirement date and abstaining from performing services for the employer on the effective date thereof does not constitute a legitimate retirement — particularly where, as here, the applicant in question remains on the employer's payroll and subsequently continues to perform services for the employer. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:52 am
Arkansas has a statute that prohibits: use a telephone for the purpose of offering any goods or services for sale, or for conveying information regarding any goods or services for the purpose of soliciting the sale or purchase of the goods of services, or for soliciting information, gathering data, or for any other purpose in connection with a political campaign when the use involves an automated system for the selection and dialing of telephone numbers… [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
Does Parliament have enough information to know where the line is drawn? [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
Does Parliament have enough information to know where the line is drawn? [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:07 am
Does Parliament have enough information to know where the line is drawn? [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:55 am
Criticism of employee performance serving pursuant to a contract with a private entityBrackman v City of New York, Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]If a public employee does not have tenure, he or she may be dismissed at any time, for any reason, or for no reason, provided that the termination does not otherwise constitute an unlawful act on the part of the public employer. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:35 am
Moreover, Uber does not offer a ride-sharing service, since the destination is selected by the passenger and the driver is paid an amount which far exceeds the mere reimbursement of costs incurred. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 10:34 am
Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:00 am
With that idea in mind, it is time to focus on defining the appropriate customer service levels, not reject the idea out of hand on the basis that however far partnership goes, it does not go that far. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:49 am
” In Facebook v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 pm
Copyright does not protect ideas, facts, processes, methods, systems or principles. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:16 am
Individual dismissed employee pursuant to Civil Service Law §71 may apply for reinstatement within one year of the termination of the disabilityStroh v Harrison School District, NYS Sup. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:24 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
The first one doesn't have the nationwide allure of a dead toddler and the Miami nightclub scene, but it does involve a whole lot of money and has a similar theme of governmental overreaching.The first case is United States of America v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2009) and Int’l Airport Centers LLC v. [read post]
