Search for: "Doe v. Shalala" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Relinquishment and Waiver of 180-Day Exclusivity Post-MMA; What is FDA Precedent and Where Might FDA be Headed?
14 Jun 2010, 1:07 pm by FDABlog HPM
Shalala, 993 F. [read post]
FDA Law Blog - http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/
You Have Been Warned - Now Do Something About It
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by Bexis
  What does that do for us? [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Why FDA regulations limiting e-cigarette marketing may cost lives and violate the Constitution
12 Dec 2017, 5:06 am by Jonathan H. Adler
“The fact that speech is in aid of a commercial purpose does not deprive responded of all First Amendment Protection,” explained the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Legal action pushes FDA on its response to qualified health claims
20 Mar 2012, 3:29 pm by Michael H. Cohen
Shalala). [read post]
CAMLAW : Complementary And Alternative Medicine Law Blog - http://www.camlawblog.com/
DC District Court Grants FDA Summary Judgment in Generic LOVENOX Dispute
7 Feb 2012, 2:25 pm by FDABlog HPM
., Inc. v. [read post]
FDA Law Blog - http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/
D.C. District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction in Generic LOVENOX Case; Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze for Sanofi to Appeal?
26 Aug 2010, 10:01 am by FDABlog HPM
Shalala, 963 F. [read post]
FDA Law Blog - http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/
A Victory In The Fight Against FDA Paternalism
9 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm by Will
Shalala, 164 F.3d 650, 657-58 (D.C. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
A Closer Look At Some Aspects Of The FDA’s Generic Drug CBE Proposal
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Panel on practice, discussion
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here â
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
Discourse.net - http://www.discourse.net/
A Presidential Succession Nightmare
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
” The clause does not define “Officer. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
D.C. District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction In Generic SEROQUEL Litigation; Dismisses "Premature" Lawsuit Without Prejudice
26 Mar 2012, 1:43 am by FDABlog HPM
Shalala, 182 F.3d 975 (D.C. [read post]
FDA Law Blog - http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/
The Potential Nomination of Merrick Garland
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Rasul v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
FTC wins big against diabetes treatment claims
27 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Off-Label Use - Yet Again
15 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
Anyway, that's what Marinol does. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
What Ifs? Trademark Law II
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Off-Label Use - The Times They Are A Changin'
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Shalala, 164 F.3d 650 (D.C. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
FDA Substantiation of Dietary Supplement Claims
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. [read post]
CAMLAW : Complementary And Alternative Medicine Law Blog - http://www.camlawblog.com/