Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Specifically, the Seventh Circuit held that although a district court does not have the inherent power to review a mootness fee paid to an individual shareholder following the voluntary dismissal of a suit under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it nonetheless may review the fee following intervention in the case by an absent shareholder, a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment and an evaluation of compliance by the plaintiff and his attorneys with Rule 11 of… [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
Muslims for Palestine, No. 1:17-CV-3591 (N.D. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 am
All three grounds failed: appeal dismissed [41]. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
The petitioners’ attention is also drawn to the CBC Guidance Note on fonts. [41]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:35 pm
It is simple genetically and evolves quickly, and exposure does not lead to lasting immunity. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
Richard Tromans 1:57 Yeah. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] The famous case involving this phenomenon is Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:26 pm
One does not speak here so much about hermeneutics. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am
(See NYSCEF 253, tr. at 39:16-41 :1 [Mehtadepo].) [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
O’Connor-Ratcliff, 41 F. 4th 1158, 1170–1171 (9th Cir. 2022); accord, Knight First Amdt. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
Case Commented On: KMN v SZM, 2024 BCCA 70 (CanLII), overturning 2023 BCSC 940 (CanLII) We have both written previously on myths and stereotypes about intimate partner violence (IPV), one of the most common of which is that women make false or exaggerated claims of violence to gain an advantage in family law disputes (see here and here). [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
How realistic that choice is does not seem to be a consideration. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
And it is incumbent on each of us to make sure it does not come to pass and that investors are not harmed by noncompliance with the securities laws when it comes to this new technology. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
In 2011, she broke the stories of the Jane Does who were accusing Jeffrey Epstein of child sex trafficking. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
Al Haq argued that Criterion 1(b) does not require a predictive assessment and sets a “lower” standard than Criterion 2(c). [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
A local housing authority does not provide housing accommodation “for the purpose only of exercising a public function”. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Switzerland (application no. 53600/20) the European Court of Human Rights held, by a majority of sixteen votes to one, that there had been:a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights;and, unanimously, that there had been:a violation of Article 6 § 1 (access to court).The case concerned a complaint by four women and a Swiss association, Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz, whose members are all older women concerned… [read post]
