Search for: "Does 1 - 47" Results 41 - 60 of 4,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2013, 4:46 am by Gregory S. Shatan
Although ICANN 47 does not officially start until Monday, the weekend features a number of working meetings of various ICANN groups, and is the unofficial beginning of each ICANN meeting. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:30 am
Practice Tip #1: While on the surface this appears to be a copyright case, an allegation of interception under 47 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:45 am by Eric
This is the only 2009 ruling addressing 47 USC 230(c)(2), the overshadowed and frequently overlooked sibling of 230(c)(1). [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:55 pm
Ras has no change, 48-47 McCain. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
  Noting that because the defendant was not a regular occupant of the facility or a likely infringer, the Ninth Circuit affirmed an award of attorneys fees in his favor.[8] [1]Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). [2] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018]  [3] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018]  [4] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v Gonzales, 901 F3d 1142, 1146-47 [9th Cir 2018]  [5] Cobbler Nevada, LLC v… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Ranchod Law Group
Here’s a glimpse of what you’ll learn:  [1:55] History of the National Interest Waiver and the Matter of Dhanasar [2:47] How does the first criteria of the NIW, substantial merit and national importance, affect you? [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
This it failed to do.Why does this decision merit the "citable" designation when it seems to be a fairly straightforward application of the Rules? [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 8:31 am by Mikolaj Barczentewicz
The CJEU’s phrasing in Schrems II is more cautious: …Article 47 of the Charter, which also contributes to the required level of protection in the European Union, compliance with which must be determined by the Commission before it adopts an adequacy decision pursuant to Article 45(1) of the GDPR In arguing that Article 47 “also contributes to the required level of protection,” the Court is not saying that it determines the required level of… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
Since the actual deviser is a person (see [38] and [47] i)) and is thus the inventor under the definition of s.7(3), the inventor must be a person ([51]). [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 5:30 pm by Ron Friedmann
And below that one static screenshot in case Tableau does not render for some readers.) [read post]