Search for: "Does 1-22" Results 41 - 60 of 14,784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch On May 22, 2024, the day after the Federal Circuit’s en banc LKQ v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:27 pm by Kevin
See, e.g., “High Court Vomits Truth in Frozen-Guru Case” (July 6, 2017); “Pagan Allowed to Wear Horns in License Photo” (Dec. 22, 2016); “Muslim Police Break Up Christian Broomstick Fight in Bethehem” (Dec. 29, 2011); “Monks Brawl Over Jurisdiction at Tomb of Christ” (Mar. 13, 2009); “Buddhist Monks Fined After All-Out Monk Brawl” (June 1, 2005). [read post]
24 May 2024, 8:48 am by Matt Roberts
On March 25, 2024, the IRS issued proposed regulations (REG-108761-22) which, if finalized, would identify certain CRATs as listed transactions. [read post]
22 May 2024, 11:15 am by Unknown
"The Role of Academics as Refugee Policy Advocates: Lessons from Australia," Policy Studies, Latest Articles, 3 May 2024 [open access] Multimedia:Advocating the Well-Being of Refugees for Comprehensive Community Empowerment, 15 May 2024 [access]- See also episodes of the SUAKA Talk series, focusing on refugees in Indonesia.Related post:- Regional Focus: Asia Pacific - Pt. 1 (22 May 2024) [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:44 am by Cyberleagle
Under the Act the eSafety Commissioner can issue a removal notice in respect of ‘Class 1’ material if (among other things) the Commissioner is satisfied that the material can be accessed by end-users in Australia. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
ASIC submitted the Notification Clause was unfair within the meaning of ss 12BF(1)(a) and 12BG(1) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act) on the basis that it: imposed an unclear disclosure obligation on the insured; suggested that Auto & General had a broader right to refuse or reduce claims than permitted under the ASIC Act; and was liable to mislead or confuse insureds as to their rights and obligations under the contract. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”[1] On August 22, 2023, respondent informed petitioner that the medical examination found him unfit for work; as such, he needed to apply for “restoration of health leave” effective August 10, 2023 if he sought to “maintain [his] healthcare coverage. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”[1] On August 22, 2023, respondent informed petitioner that the medical examination found him unfit for work; as such, he needed to apply for “restoration of health leave” effective August 10, 2023 if he sought to “maintain [his] healthcare coverage. [read post]