Search for: "Does 1-61" Results 41 - 60 of 2,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
  The Supreme Court of Appeals found that her argument required it to examine the Victim Protection Act, West Virginia Code §§ 61–11A–1 to 8. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
We have two locations: in the Central West End, at 1 North Taylor, St. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Furthermore, although the application does contain theoretical examples how enhancers which increase the expression of the LIPG polypeptide or which increase the enzymatic activity of the LIPG polypeptide could be identified, the application as filed does not contain any guidance for the skilled person which would allow her/him an educated guess as to for example a particular chemical structural class to which the enhancers recited in claim 1 belong. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm by Rick Hills
Consider the following train wreck of Necessary & Proper reasoning contained in Judge Vinson's opinion striking down the individual mandate: (1) It is a legitimate end for Congress to regulate the insurance industry to prevent "insurers from excluding or charging higher rates to people with pre-existing conditions" (pages 60-61); (2) The Individual Mandate in the ACA is "necessary" to enable Congress to regulate the insurance industry in this manner… [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:01 am by tekEditor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 # License: Public Domain.# Author: Joseph Wecker, 2012# Are you tired of trying to remember what .bashrc does vs .bash_profile vs .profile? [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this revocation appeal Board 3.2.02 inter alia examined claim 1 of the fourth auxiliary request as to its compliance with A 53(c). [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm by oliver randl
Irrespective of whether its priority is valid or not, in particular as regards its claim 3 and Example C6, in the board’s view it does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:35 am
” You might think NYC should just use the new place and not employ a blind worker, but consider that there is a pre-existing but run-down newsstand in the lobby, run by a 61-year-old blind man who's worked there for 10 years, the design of the new shelves really does facilitate shoplifting, and there are other aspects of the design that aren't suitable for a blind person. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:00 am by Adrian Miedema
The Court also noted that the WSIA’s cut-off of loss of earnings benefits “does not create a disadvantage based on a stereotypical attribute. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Restoring the name of a candidate to an eligible list, even one improperly earlier removed from the list, does not obviate the application of the so-called Rule of Three, Civil Service Law §61(1). [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:20 am by Scott Brinkman
Louis, at 1 North Taylor (on the corner of Taylor and Laclede), 63108; and in the Twin Cities of Festus / Crystal City, at 1000 Truman Blvd (Highway 61/67), 63019. [read post]