Search for: "Does 1-64"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,756
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
Peckham alluded to this evidence without directly citing to it when he wrote, "In looking through statistics regarding all trades and occupations, it may be true that the trade of a baker does not appear to be as healthy as some other trades, and is also vastly more healthy than still others. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
For corporate firms with 1 to over 5,000 employees, the overall percentage was 59.3%. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:17 am
Co., 64 N.Y.2d 846, 848, 476 N.E.2d 640, 641, 487 N.Y.S.2d 314, 315 (1985) 2 Seaboard Surety Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
18(1) to s. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
FAQs Part 64 . [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
First, a set of Draft Principles were circulated in November 2010.[1] After a period set aside for public comment and following revision of the text,[2] the SRSG circulated the final version of the UNGP (with an included Official Commentary) in March 2011 annexed to his (final) 2011 SRSG Report,[3] the text of which was substantially revised from the circulated November 2010 Draft. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
However, this is not quite what Cromwell J. says in Strickland, although he does say he sees “no reason to doubt” that is the case (Strickland, para. 64). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm
Advocate General Szpunar, who delivered the Opinion in the case, also recalls that as an exception to the general rule laid out by the Directive, ‘Article 3(4) […] must be interpreted strictly’ (para. 64). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm
The PTO form PTO/SB/64 also includes a number of statements of situations that are not unintentional abandonment: Petitioner is reminded that a delay resulting from a deliberately chosen course of action on the part of the applicant does not become an “unintentional” delay within the meaning of 37 CFR 1.137 because: the applicant does not consider the claims to be patentable over the references relied upon in an outstanding Office action; the applicant… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
§ 9792.21.1(d)(1), other medical treatment guidelines such as the ACOEM and ODG at 8 Cal. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
”[1] – ‘Stable Diffusion Litigation’ (website created by attorneys on behalf of the artists) “If a work is transformative…then it’s not a violation of copyright and the plaintiff simply has no ground on which to stand to file a copyright infringement case…[T]hose who refuse to acknowledge advancements in technology and instead fight against them are like whittlers mad at power tools. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
It does honor to the distinguished and long running series of which it is now an integral part. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization), does not repudiate Meyer and Pierce so much as complete the recasting of their concerns (together with those of West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:48 am
AI’s energy footprint does not end with training–after training comes users or the “inference” phase. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Peckham alluded to this evidence without directly citing to it when he wrote, “In looking through statistics regarding all trades and occupations, it may be true that the trade of a baker does not appear to be as healthy as some other trades, and is also vastly more healthy than still others. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
" with the Cuban apparatus.Pix Credit hereThis is not to suggest that the fever dream of the American and Cuban exile establishment will inevitably harvest the plot on which Caribbean Marxism was planted; the collapse of the contemporary Cuban political-economic model doe not necessarily or inevitably mean the establishment of a liberal democratic state, or of a military or a klepto-dictatorship of some sort (though the model provided by the historical arc of Nicaragua's… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Here are tips to get started: 1. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
In any event, responsibility does not require a formal agreement between the controllers as regards the purposes and means of processing (para 44). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:14 am
BGE X ZR 64/21 of the German Federal Court of Justice)). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
